Nobel Prize winning economist D. Kahneman proposes a simple puzzle. "A
bat and a ball cost $1.10. The
bat costs one dollar more than the ball. How
much does the ball cost?" He states that most people come up with a quick answer - 10 cents.
The
distinctive mark of this easy puzzle is that it suggests an answer that is
intuitive, appealing, and wrong. Do the math and you'll see. If the ball costs
10 cents, then the total cost will be $1.20 (10 cents for the ball and $1.10
for the bat), not $1.10. The correct answer is 5 cents.
If
you got the puzzle wrong, don't be discouraged. According to Kahneman's
research, more than 50 % of students at Harvard, MIT, and Princeton gave the
wrong answer. At public universities, over 80% of students failed the puzzle. Solving it doesn't depend on intelligence as much as it
depends on our willingness to slow down, focus intently, and pay attention.
Kahneman
describes also the “invisible gorilla test” - a team of 3 people dressed in
black and a team of 3 people dressed in white passing a basketball to their
teammates. The volunteers watching the game were told to keep track of how many
times some basketball players tossed a basketball. While they did this, someone
in a gorilla suit walked across the basketball court, in plain view, yet many
of the volunteers failed even to notice the beast.
What
the invisible gorilla study shows is that, if we are paying very close
attention to one thing, we often fail to notice other things in our field of
vision—even very obvious things. Our senses can play tricks on us - “inattentional
blindness”. It can have serious
implications, even life-threatening implications.
Three scientists at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston wondered if
expert observers are also subject to this perceptual blindness in diagnosing cancers. They
recruited 24 experienced and credentialed radiologists—and a comparable group
of naïve volunteers. They tracked their eye movements as they examined five
patients’ CT scans, each made up of hundreds of images of lung tissue. Each
case had about ten nodules hiding somewhere in the scans, and the radiologists
were instructed to click on these nodules with a mouse. On the final case, the
scientists inserted a tiny image of a gorilla into the lung. They wanted to see if the radiologists, focused on the nodules, would be blind to the strange and easily detectable gorilla.
The
gorilla picture was about the size
of a box of matches, or 48 times the size of a typical nodule. It faded in and
out—becoming more, then less opaque—over a sequence of five images. There was no mistaking the gorilla: If
someone pointed it out on the lung scan and asked, What is that? – everyone
would answer: That’s a gorilla.
After they were done scrolling through the images as much as they wanted, the scientists asked them three questions:
After they were done scrolling through the images as much as they wanted, the scientists asked them three questions:
-
Did that last trial seem any different?
- Did you notice anything unusual on the final trial? And finally:
- Did you see a gorilla on the final trial?
- Did you notice anything unusual on the final trial? And finally:
- Did you see a gorilla on the final trial?
Twenty
of the twenty four radiologists failed to see the gorilla, despite scrolling past it
more than four times on average. And this was not because it was difficult to
see: When shown the image again after the experiment, all of them saw the
gorilla.
Bottom
line – it’s very easy for us mere humans to get deceived, to miss things and/or
just not pay attention that well. The invisible gorilla shows up in many
workplaces too. Being focused on doing
more we
tend to miss some of the very important details that might change our outlook
and approach towards those things we are so focused on.
When
you read your Bible, take a step back. As Jesus says in Mathew 24:15 “whoever reads, let him understand”.
Take
also a step back in your life and look for that gorilla. Maybe
your gorilla won’t be as easy to see it from the first attempt but there’s one
there…if you look hard enough.